Margaret Mead's landmark 1928 ethnographic study of adolescence among Samoan girls, which concluded that Samoan adolescence passed smoothly, without the emotional turmoil common in the contemporary United States, and read that contrast as evidence for culture rather than biology as the shaping force. The study made Mead a leading public voice for cultural relativism, and decades later Derek Freeman challenged her account directly, arguing she had misread Samoan sexual culture; the dispute is treated on this atlas as a live, unsettled scholarly disagreement, not a settled verdict either way.
Facts
Typical RegionSourced to the subject's own account Documented YearSourced to the subject's own account Cross-Tradition Connections
Studied By
Mead is the study's author and fieldworker, not merely a later commentator on it.
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Coming of Age in Samoa
WikipediaEducational problems: American and Samoan contrasts, descriptionQuote, Educational problems: American and Samoan contrasts, description
Mead concluded that the passage from childhood to adulthood (adolescence) in Samoa was a smooth transition and not marked by the emotional or psychological distress, anxiety, or confusion seen in the United States.
Open Questions (1 open question)
Did Margaret Mead's account of relatively unrestricted adolescent sexuality in Samoa accurately reflect Samoan culture, or did Derek Freeman's later fieldwork and critique reveal fundamental errors in her original conclusions?
Derek Freeman argued that Mead had misunderstood Samoan culture when she concluded that it placed few restrictions on youths' sexual exploration, contending she gave too little weight to biology and to violence in Samoan life. Later reassessment, notably Paul Shankman's 2009 study, concluded that Freeman himself had cherry-picked data and misrepresented both Mead and Samoan culture. Neither side's account has displaced the other in the scholarly literature, and both original participants (Mead's Samoan informants of the 1920s, Freeman's of the 1960s onward) are separated from the dispute by decades and by the very different circumstances of their fieldwork.
What would resolve this A methodological reassessment capable of adjudicating between Mead's original 1920s participant-observation fieldwork and Freeman's later, structured reinterviewing conducted decades afterward, or additional independent, contemporaneous sources from 1920s Samoa that neither anthropologist could access.
Anthropological historiography and the ethics and methodology of ethnographic fieldworkWikipedia: Coming of Age in Samoa
Dissenting Readings (1 dissenting reading)
Description
Freeman argued that Mead had misunderstood Samoan culture when she concluded it placed few restrictions on youths' sexual exploration, contending her fieldwork gave insufficient weight to the influence of biology on behavior and to the real levels of violence in Samoan life. Later reassessment, notably Paul Shankman's 2009 study, concluded that Freeman himself had cherry-picked data and misrepresented both Mead and Samoan culture, so this dissent is recorded as a genuinely unsettled scholarly dispute rather than a correction Freeman is shown to have won.
A dissenting reading, from an independent laneWikipedia: Derek Freeman, Wikipedia
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Margaret Mead's Samoa research still controversial?
Derek Freeman disputed Mead's account decades later, and later scholarship found problems with Freeman's critique too; the question is still genuinely open.
Mead's 1928 study concluded that Samoan adolescence passed smoothly, without the emotional turmoil common in the contemporary United States, evidence she read as showing culture rather than biology shapes the experience of adolescence. Decades later the anthropologist Derek Freeman argued Mead had misread Samoan sexual culture and given too little weight to biology and to real violence in Samoan life. Later scholarship, notably Paul Shankman's 2009 study, concluded that Freeman himself had cherry-picked data and misrepresented both Mead and Samoan culture. The dispute has never been fully settled in either direction, which is why this atlas records it as a live, named scholarly disagreement rather than a resolved question.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.